TransparenSea

A couple of days ago, I presented the current public relations turnaround of SeaWorld.

After years of brushing off the press and animal rights advocates concerning the breeding of “Shamu” Orca whales solely for entertainment purposes, SeaWorld has decided to join forces with the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) to bring change to the organization.

SeaWorld has committed to:

  • Stop breeding the whales
  • Phase out the “Shamu” shows within the next few years
  • Create whale “encounters” for the public to view the whales in a more “natural” setting, without theatrics.
89700a65aea541d08c27891a9356c7ae_logo

Logo: SeaWorld Website

From a PR perspective, SeaWorld has changed direction by:

  • Hiring a new VP of communications, after Fred Jacobs resigned from that position after 25 years.
  • Creating a brand new commercial stating their new position.
  • CEO Joel Manby is actively giving interviews to the press talking about the changes at the theme park, SeaWorld’s alliance with HSUS and why SeaWorld has done a complete policy reversal in almost exactly a one-year period of time.

That’s where I left off.  And I took yesterday to try to find two things:

  1. A shareable version of the new television commercial
  2. The reason for the reversal in policy regarding the whales.

I was unsuccessful at finding the commercial to share, but SeaWorld’s website has other videos and information similar to the commercial.

The animal lover in me wanted to find that the reason was noble.  I was hoping to find “It’s the right thing to do for the benefit of the whales” or some version of that statement.

But, the professional me recalled all those lessons about objectivity and transparency drummed into my brain about objectivity and transparency.  If this story was to be credible and accurate, I needed to be objective and SeaWorld needed to be transparent.

In all honesty, I was trying my hardest to be objective, but I was doubtful we’d ever really know the real reason behind SeaWorld’s policy shift.

Transparency

Boy was I wrong!

They were laying it all on the line in brutal honesty, and from a PR perspective, I have to say it was refreshing and gave me hope in the future of my profession.

In an interview for the San Diego Union Tribune, CEO Manby stated that the reason for the change in policy regarding the whales is all about the bottom line: money. sack-of-money-clipart-nTX6xgnTB.png

Manby is quoted by reporter Lori Weisberg:

 “We understand some customers are upset and you may feel betrayed but in a simple way, the data and trends showed it was either a SeaWorld without whales or a world without SeaWorld,” he said during the webcast. “We are an organization that needs to have cash flow to (succeed) and unfortunately, the trends were not in our favor.

 “I know that’s blunt but that’s the simple fact. We need your support more than ever so that SeaWorld will continue to exist.”
How’s that for transparency?  I can’t say that I was impressed with that reason, but it’s not often that we get such a completely honest answer from large corporations.  SeaWorld should be commended for this PR approach. 
But are they?  
I have no questions for discussion today, but tomorrow we’ll take a look at some ways people and organizations are responding to SeaWorld’s PR campaign, consider how this policy shift may affect other organizations and present some questions to you.
Thanks for following, have a great day and I look forward to meeting you here tomorrow for discussion.

Sea World’s Public Relations 180

For the past two weeks, my empty nest has been filled with college students on spring break.  I have mixed feelings about them returning home.  Schedules change, there’s more housework, dishes, cooking, etc.  That’s the part that I’m not thrilled about.

But, I love the times that my two intelligent 20-somethings sit and talk with me about important issues.  For the first time, they’re both very interested in the upcoming presidential election, and they have varying opinions about nearly everything.  Sometimes we agree; other times, not so much. Regardless, the conversation is lively and sometimes loud, which is normal for us.  My husband is full Italian and I’m mostly French, which makes for an interesting combination in our kids.

Anyway, one of the topics we discussed was Sea World‘s recent decision to stop breeding orca whales and phase out theatrical shows featuring the mammals.

This is something we’ve been talking about since they both watched the documentary Blackfish.  To be honest, I haven’t seen it, nor do I intend to.  I know I just couldn’t bear it, the same way I change the channel every time one of those abused animal commercials comes on television.  Knowing this, both kids have repeatedly told me “Mom, you can’t watch Blackfish.”

So when Sea World’s announcement was made that they were now partnering with the Humane Society of America we talked about it some more.

We’re both for the decision for the sake of the whales.  But I stressed that I don’t understand animal activists who would prefer the whales be released into the wild.  “They just won’t survive,” I said.  They agreed, and that was the end of the conversation.

But then, yesterday, I saw the new Sea World commercial and the above video, and I really started to look at the situation from a PR perspective.  (I’m trying to get a shareable version of the commercial to share for next time).

For years, Sea World has been dodging criticism from animal rights organizations. In addition to Blackfish, there was Free Willy and the three other Free Willy films, as well as tons of bad, bad press.

As of last year, Sea World seemed to be oblivious to the criticism and took an interesting PR approach.

This is Sea World’s 2015 commercial.

The commercial wasn’t your normal “come to Sea World” commercial. Instead, it was more like a video PR message and it was unsuccessful.

Additionally, the commercial was release in conjunction with the #AskSeaWorld Twitter campaign, that failed miserably on all accounts.  Instead of generating questions about Sea World and it’s mammal and sea charges, Twitter users took the opportunity to lash out about animal rights.

According to CNN Money, Sea World’s stocks dropped drastically after the release of the commercial and launching the Twitter campaign.

So what has happened in the past year to make Sea World do a 180 degree turn-around?

Well, for one, Sea World’s long-time VP of corporate communications Fred Jacobs left Sea World in December 2015.

We’ll pick up this story next time, so be sure to check back.  But for now, discuss this:

Up for discussion

  1. What do you think was the primary reason that the 2015 commercial and Twitter campaign failed Sea World?  Was it the message itself, was it the wrong approach after Blackfish, or was it something else?

As usual, all respectful and constructive dialogue is welcome and needed.

Stories to follow this weekend

Top 5 PR stories to follow this weekend

Help a new PR pro out by answering important questions

  1. Not-for-profit sector: Wounded Warrior Project fires top two executives after an investigation done by CBS into the charity’s spending practices reveals questionable expenses.

    download (3)

    Wikipedia

 Q:  What will this mean for the not-for-profit, and what advice can you give their PR team?


2. Marketing/PR campaign partnership:  Lane Bryant criticizes networks for not airing its #ThisBody video.

Q:  From a PR perspective, will Lane Bryant’s criticism work in their favor? 


3. Entertainment/Animal Rights Advocacy: Dog Whisperer, Cesar Millan is investigated for animal abuse.

Q: How do you think this will play out in the media?  What do you think Millan’s publicist should do? 

12853205_1536581583309258_481160324_n

Millan: Facebook


 

4. Press Releases: Nestle’ USA issues a press release detailing voluntary recall of several of its food items.

Q: What can we learn about writing press releases from this example? 


 

5. Politics:  Ben Carson endorsed Donald Trump for President.  At a time when the GOP is trying its hardest to defeat Trump as the party’s nomination, will Carson’s support help or hinder the GOP’s efforts?

– Please address this situation from a PR standpoint, with objectiveness. 

 

As usual, all respectful and constructive dialogue is welcome and needed.

Memorable Dining @ Joe’s

The Ignite Restaurant Group is a portfolio of restaurant concepts fused together by a common commitment to provide guests with memorable, matchless dining experiences. Led by the belief that a spark of inspiration can ignite new, creative ideas and yield great results, Ignite has an uncompromising passion for delivering distinctive experiences for its guests, a work environment with rich opportunity for its team members, and best-in-class results for its stakeholders”

One of the franchises in the Ignite Restaurant Group is Joe’s Crab Shack, which is famous for its “Eat at Joe’s” slogan and steamed seafood pots.

This week, Joe’s finds itself in hot water and a compromising PR situation when it delivered a truly memorable, matchless, distinctive dining experience in its Roseville, MN location.

The last thing Tyrone Williams and his friend expected when they went to eat at Joe’s on Wednesday of this week was to find an 1895 photo of a lynching in Texas under their glass tabletop with the caption “All I said was ‘I don’t like the gumbo.'”

12795497_1090351030985101_846305055158808381_n

Photo via Facebook

Joe’s Response

Williams promptly posted the picture on Facebook, asking friends to call into Ignite’s corporate office to complain, and on Thursday urged members of his community to join him and the Minneapolis NCAACP  in a press conference outside the restaurant.

 

Williams also brought his complaint to the manager of the restaurant, who was apologetic. Later, a corporate representative of Ignite and Joe’s Crab Shack called Williams, offering him and his guest a $100 gift card and an apology, which Williams turned down because he said that he will never eat at Joe’s again.

David Catalano, Chief Operating Officer of Ignite issued the following statement:

“We understand one of the photos used in our table décor at our Joe’s Crab Shack location in Roseville, MN was offensive. We take this matter very seriously, and the photo in question was immediately removed. We sincerely apologize to our guests who were disturbed by the image and we look forward to continuing to serve the Roseville community.”

Like so many organizations before, Joe’s is using the bury-our-heads-in-the-sand approach.  My question to so many PR managers and organizations is: Why can’t we learn from the mistakes of others?

Instead of offering transparency about the instance on the “official” Facebook page, Joe’s went on as if nothing had happened.

Capture

Facebook photo

Obviously this is a bad move on Ignite’s and Joe’s part because the public is not letting them off the hook that easily.

 

Capture

Facebook comments on Joe’s Crab Shack’s Sparkling Rita post Mar. 10, 2016

 

Joe’s tweets didn’t address the situation either. Ditto for their Instagram.

Capture

Joe’s Crab Shack Twitter Mar. 11, 2016

 

Up for discussion

  1. How would you rate Joe’s and Ignite’s responses to the lynching photo so far?
  2. If you were the PR manager for Joe’s or Ignite, would you have opted for more transparency regarding the situation?
  3. Earlier this month, Ignite issued their quarterly statement that showed a 4.7% decrease in revenue compared to the same quarter last year, and shares fell 9.7% on March 4.  How do you think that the situation in Roseville, MN will affect revenues for the entire group?
  4. How can Joe’s and Ignite move forward and regain the public’s favor?

 

As usual, all respectful and constructive dialog is welcome and needed.

 

Hot Scotch: A family affair

There once were two single departments.

A little more than a quarter century ago, there were two separate departments: public relations and marketing. The departments functioned and acted separately, both coexisting on behalf of the organization.

It used to be that the marketing department’s job was to generate sales among the targeted audience(s), and the purpose of the public relations department was to build lasting relationships for the organization among many different groups.  There was often a “love-hate relationship” between the two departments, but never a marriage of duties.

But one day, they were joined together.

Today many organizations marry the two functions into one department.  Some say globalization brought the two together; some say it was the change from traditional news sources to the internet and social media that forced the union. It might have even had something to do with the economy and organizations needing to downsize to stay afloat.

Regardless of the reason, we are seeing more and more public relations messages communicating marketing messages and vice versa. Like a married couple who will often start finishing each others sentences, sometimes it’s hard to tell which function is doing the talking: marketing or PR.

Content marketing is one way in which organizational marketing and public relations communications often are one and the same. Many of the tools marketers now use to attract more sales, such as news, ebooks, white papers, case studies, how-to guides, and podcasts, were once tools used solely by the public relations department.

Trouble on the home front.

Because marketing and PR are joined together and tools of both trades are shared, there is often a “turf war” between marketers and PR pros.  Like two divorcing parents, an organization’s website, social media accounts and blogs are the children caught up in an ugly custody battle.

I’m sure that some might say that bad marketing strategies actually causes more problems for public relations managers. And I’m sure that a lot of marketers blame public relations managers for their problems.

But every once in a while you come across a story that shows how marketing and PR can work together.

Hot Scotch: A family affair

According to several recent news sources, including CNN, it is predicted that the world’s supply of single malt scotch is dwindling.

I won’t pretend that I know anything about scotch, aside that my husband likes to drink it and it’s really expensive for those of us on beer budgets. So, if you’re wondering what makes scotch so scotch-y, I recommend you head over to Malt Madness.  This site has everything you’d ever want to know about scotch and other whisky and whiskey.

But, the fact that there is going to be a shortage on good, quality scotch wasn’t what made me consider this story.  Instead, I wondered who was responsible for generating this news?  Was it marketing or public relations?

After some investigating, and considering the CNN story that has everyone running to liquor stores today, I considered a third option.

Neither public relations nor marketing was the source.  Instead, it was their child who is telling this story.

The product of the marriage of PR and marketing.

Investor Relations, the bi-product of both public relations and marketing, integrates marketing strategies into communications dealing with investors and potential investors. Investor relations falls under the category of specialized public relations, and the very nature of this specialty requires a close working relationship with both marketing and public relations.

In the case of the scotch shortage story, investor relations was most likely responsible for disseminating the news.  And here’s why:

  1. The news focused on the investment value of scotch.
  2. Stephen Notman, quoted in the article, is “Scotland’s Ambassador to Whisky in China“.  Notman holds a degree in Politics and International Relations, but has assumed duties of marketing scotch to the public and investors in China, and does this by creating special public relations events.  If you’re confused as to whether Notman is a marketer, a PR manager or is in charge of investor relations, it’s difficult to say.
  3. The news article reads very much like a PR press release, generating more news for the industry’s public relations departments, but . . .
  4. Marketers of the scotch industry will surely benefit, too.  Surely sales of scotch will start to soar and prices will rise, especially for the really, really good stuff. This is also good news for investors. Whenever a shortage of a product is announced, there usually is a quick spike in sales of that product. And this is not a new phenomenon to the whisky or whiskey industry as a whole.

After carefully considering the news story and determining the source, I conclude that this story benefits the entire family: Marketing, PR and Investor Relations.

Sometimes it takes the children to show the parents how to get along.

_____________________________________________

As the economy grows more globally, and communications department relies more and more upon integrated and converged media, we will soon need a family tree to determine what department is related to each other and which departments will be a perfect match for each other.

Paige Hawin of PR Daily suggests that we might even see a new child come into the world with an integration of PR and international relations, or public affairs. The Stephen Notmans of the world are showing how that might happen sooner than expected.

I expect that we’ll  be seeing a lot more stories like the scotch shortage one.  And, I see more family squabbles over which department gets more control over which forms of communications.

But if we end up with successful integration of communications, such as the scotch shortage story, then we’ll all benefit.

What do you think?

All respectful and constructive dialogue is welcome and needed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Event planning IS PR, too!

Last week I had a job interview for an Event Coordinator position.  The interview went well, better than I actually thought, and I’m being brought in today for a second interview. Apparently, it’s down to me and one other person out of 200 applicants.

But there was one question that puzzled me a little bit during last week’s interview.

I was asked the following question:

“Does it bother you that this job isn’t a PR job per say?”  I’m not sure if I remember the exact wording, but that’s the gist.

This is how I responded.  Again, I’m not sure if this is the exact response I gave, but it comes close.

“I’m not sure what you mean.  Everything about event coordinating IS PR.”

To be clear, there was no contempt in my tone, when I made the statement. I believed I smiled when I answered.

I think what the interviewer meant was that I wouldn’t be doing a lot of public writing, social media, or the so-called mainstream tasks that people expect from a public relations pro.

But, I stand by my answer.  And here’s why event coordination is an important part of PR:

  • Public Relations is all about creating a positive image for an organization, person, corporation or brand in the eyes of the public.  Successfully planning and carrying out events is just as important in accomplishing that goal as writing a press release.  In fact, without events, there’s not a lot to write about.
  • Likewise, event coordination includes having a close working relationship with the communications/PR department. I can’t think of any time in which an event coordinator can successfully do their job without being in sync with the communications department.  It’s a truly interdependent relationship.
  • Events can often speak louder to the public than more traditional forms of PR.  If the event is successful, then the public views the organization as favorable.
  • Events give the public an opportunity to interact with you in ways that reading a press release or seeing an interview on television just can’t accomplish.
  • Event coordination not only provides opportunities to reach target markets, but provides opportunities to present a positive image for the organization, corporation, person or brand to vendors, sponsors, volunteers and the press.  These groups are important to present a positive image to, as well.
  • Event coordination typically enlists more than one department or person.  Press releases might deal with one area of the organization at a time, but event coordination requires that several, or all, departments come together to present a common message or image to the public.
535288_380008205383363_2023471363_n

Event coordination is the perfect time for organizations to inform the public, make new “friends” and nurture existing relationships.

 

These are just a few reasons event coordination is every bit a PR job as other, more commonly thought of PR jobs.

 

Please don’t hear what I’m not saying.  I’m not knocking the more traditional tasks of PR. Every part of PR works together to be the bridge between the public and the organization, person, brand, corporation, etc.  But event coordination is a huge part of PR, too, and not to be considered any less a part of PR.

If I get the position, I welcome the opportunity to develop good relationships with so many different people all at once on behalf of the organization: the entire staff, vendors, sponsors, volunteers, press, and the public.

And isn’t that what PR is all about?

 

Up for discussion:

  1. Have you ever had to plan an event as part of your PR duties?  If yes, what PR tasks did you perform in that role?
  2. Most organizations don’t have a separate events coordinator and rely upon the communications/PR person or team to perform that role.  Can you think of ways in which having a person dedicated solely to event coordination can be a benefit to the PR manager?

As usual, all respectful and constructive dialogue is welcome and necessary.